Search for: "Cruz v. State" Results 641 - 660 of 972
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2012, 5:41 am by Administrator
May 24, 2010 – The United States Supreme Court decides Hardt v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:04 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
   The Texas Supreme Court recently considered the position taken by the Fifth Court of Appeals and rejected it in Cruz v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
Bagley on Tuesday, May 22, and United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by azatty
WHAT: Major Forum on upcoming Supreme Court oral arguments in State of Arizona v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 2:50 am
’Advocate General Advocate General Pedro Cruz Villalon advised the CJEU to answer all these questions quite simply: ‘Where conduct occurs via the internet which is liable to infringe a national trade mark registered in a Member State, Article 5(3) of Regulation No 44/2001 must be interpreted as meaning that it attributes jurisdiction: – to the courts of the Member State in which the trade mark is registered – and to the courts of the Member… [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:32 am by Rob
The long awaited decision in Brinker v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:28 am
A single market, perhaps, but the EU remains a patch- work of jurisdictions Last week the IPKat posted this note on the Opinion of Advocate General Cruz Villalón in Case C 616/10 Solvay SA v Honeywell Fluorine Products Europe BV, Honeywell Belgium NV and Honeywell Europe NV on the need to take a more subtle, "nuanced" approach when deciding when a single European Union national court might rule on patent infringement and invalidity issues that have been raised in… [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:33 pm
It gave us the slip for a while and dipped beneath the Kats' radar, but the Opinion of Advocate General Cruz Villalón in Case C 616/10 Solvay SA v Honeywell Fluorine Products Europe BV, Honeywell Belgium NV and Honeywell Europe NV was bound to end up on the blogosphere eventually. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:16 am by Tejinder Singh
Tomorrow the Court will hear argument in Vasquez v. [read post]