Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 641 - 660
of 6,201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 9:53 am
¶ [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:43 pm
Rather, the claims simply state that the “compliance mechanism” can perform various functions. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 3:07 am
In addition, neither did the claimant invoke the European law on data protection (para. 90) nor does the Brussels Ibis Regulation require that an injunction issued by the court of a Member State also has effects in third states (para. 91). [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 2:26 am
State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:36 pm
(Basu v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 2:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 2:42 pm
United States, 278F.3d 641, 643 (6th Cir. 2002); Schubert v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:02 am
U.S.), 2004 I.C.J. 12, 52 ¶ 97 (Judgment of Mar. 31)). [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 11:22 am
Summers v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 6:41 am
Philip Morris v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:24 pm
¶ 12. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 2:08 pm
¶34 (quoting Villa v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 2:29 pm
" ACCA has decided that issue for Estrada, in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 2:29 pm
" ACCA has decided that issue for Estrada, in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:10 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 9:10 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:11 pm
Not all contract terms, however, are expressly stated in a contract. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
” Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
