Search for: "State v. B. Williams" Results 641 - 660 of 3,064
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The obstruction charge does include a statement that the charged actions were “consistent with President Trump’s previous efforts to undermine United States Government investigations into foreign interference in United States elections. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
” Law professor and historian Jed Shugerman, who unlike Turley favored impeachment on the substantive charges in Article I, has agreed, suggesting that Trump should not be impeached for obstruction because impeachment should be a last resort and “[b]y definition, the House impeaching for unlitigated subpoenas is no last resort. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
Cinemas cOULD now screen Cecil B. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
Fourth, what is to be made of statements by Attorney General William Barr and U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 12:04 pm by Peter Margulies
(For a contrary view, see the Dec. 9 statements by Attorney General William Barr and U.S. [read post]
Williams, 7 F.Supp. 2d 40, 52 (D.D.C. 1998), vacated in part, United Staes v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
Family Court Act § 412(2)(d), Domestic Relations Law § 236B(5-a)(b)(5) and § 236B(6)(b)(4) were amended to fix the date of the biennial adjustment of the temporary, post-divorce and spousal maintenance "income caps" at March 1" rather than January 31', as currently provided. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
In addition to the populations of Bikini and   Enewetak, the people of Rongelap and Utirik were also affected by radioactive fallout from the largest nuclear test the United States has ever conducted, the Bravo test held March 1, 1954. [read post]