Search for: "United States v. United Technologies Corp."
Results 641 - 660
of 1,643
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2015, 8:36 am
Finisar Corp. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 3:51 pm
Id. at 4-5 (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Ltd v ZTE Corp., ZTE Deutschland GmbH | CJEU on disclosure of infringers’ bank data in Coty Germany GmbH v Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg | Infocit - Prestação de Serviços, Comércio Geral e Indústria, Lda v OHIM | Moral ambiguity of trade secrets | CJEU on limits of TM exclusive right in TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV v Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd |… [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:54 am
United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, (1999) and Murphy v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:24 pm
Iqbal (2009) and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 3:46 am
On 16 July the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in Case C-170/13 Huawei Technologies Co. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 5:39 am
Promega Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
Misclassification of employees as independent contractors is found in an increasing number of workplaces in the United States, in part reflecting larger restructuring of business organizations. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:54 pm
" In reaching her decision, the judge cited last year's Supreme Court ruling in Alice Corp v CLS Bank stating that "while the very idea of allowing multiple-device playback may have been novel at the time of invention, the second step of the Alice/Mayo test requires more than a novel ideal - it requires a specific application of that idea, to ensure that all embodiments of the idea (even if novel) are not preempted. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
Ltd v ZTE Corp., ZTE Deutschland GmbH. a reference from the Landgericht Düsseldorf on a matter of great concern to the standard-essential patent (SEP) community. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Whatever your feelings about the doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales], it's a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 12:24 pm
As the Supreme Court ruledin Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
Guest Post: In Rush to Invalidate Patents at Pleadings Stage, Are Courts Coloring Outside the Lines?
1 Jul 2015, 3:30 pm
United States, 683 F.3d 1102, 1108 (9th Cir. 2012); In re American Cont’l Corp. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am
United States[13], the district court refused to enforce plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena that sought documents from defendant’s expert witness. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
The discovery obligations with respect to statistician expert witnesses vary considerably among state and federal courts. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:53 am
EMED Technologies Corp. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 10:55 am
The case of Kingdomware Technologies, Inc., v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
Dollar General Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
First up is Dollar General Corp. v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 9:02 am
<> Pebble LP v. [read post]
