Search for: "WILDS v. STATE" Results 641 - 660 of 1,489
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2007, 4:31 am
Case Name: In The Interest of FM: BA v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
Alas, as the Gorsuch Court thought it was moving us forward we in fact are back to the ancient days of the Wild West.There was a time when the Constitution did not require state and local governments to make religious exemptions to generally applicable laws, and the issue of whether to grant such exemptions was left to the states and the People. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:31 pm by Eric Segall
 Prior to the 2000 Supreme Court decision in Mitchell v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
Clearly, you liked the nation’s capital just fine: you chose to stay on for college at American University and only left the city for the wild and distant climes of Montgomery County, Maryland in ’66, once you had your Ph.D in business. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 1:34 pm by WIMS
" The Appeals Court said, "We reject the first claim, since the EPA expressly found that the 5.0 mg/L limit was necessary to meet state standards, and that a higher limit would not achieve those standards. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
  Now that the Supreme Court has extended Heller, and the 2nd Amendment, to the states in last week’s decision in McDonald v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:11 am by SHG
Maryland, to the extent such a rule could be discerned from Wild Bill Douglas' modest proposal. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:01 pm
  Moving forward to Tuesday 16 September, the joint IPKat and IP Finance dialogue between Kat-blogger Neil Wilkof and Intellectual Asset Management editor Joff Wild about patent values and how patent litigation affects them now has 33 people signed up -- so there's plenty of room if you're curious to attend. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:10 am by Jeffrey Kahn
  Justice Brennan, dissenting from the 5-4 opinion in Abel v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 4:02 am by Ben
 Witte Wievenkaas is now sold under the name Wilde Wietze Dip.Levola argued that the taste of food, like literary, scientific or artistic works, could be copyrighted, citing the 2006 case involving Lancôme, the cosmetics company, that had accepted in principle that the scent of a perfume could be eligible for copyright protection. [read post]