Search for: "Application of Smith"
Results 6621 - 6640
of 7,623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2007, 3:16 am
A780
Wright -- Authorizes an application for permission to appeal to the court of appeals from an order concerning a change of venue No Same as Last Act: 06/12/07 reported referred to rulesA4529
Seminerio -- Provides for the crediting of prior service by the fire department pension fund of the city of New York Same as Uni. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
" The only distinction, Cady asserted, was sexual orientation, and "this distinction cannot defeat the application of equal protection analysis through the application of the similarly situated concept because, under this circular approach, all distinctions would evade equal protection review. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am
Smith, 860 S.E.2d 51 (2021) (unpublished) (citing this framework from Hobbs). [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 11:08 pm
" [17] Van Gorkom The next case is Smith v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:49 pm
Of course, the Oechsli study, the Smith study, the Buttar study on teratogenicity, and the Jick study all support this finding. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
The intentions of the framers of a given constitutional provision can be formulated as abstract and general principles or as particular expectations with respect to various anticipated applications of the provision. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
The intentions of the framers of a given constitutional provision can be formulated as abstract and general principlesor as particular expectations with respect to various anticipated applications of the provision. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
The intentions of the framers of a given constitutional provision can be formulated as abstract and general principles or as particular expectations with respect to various anticipated applications of the provision. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:59 am
Case comment by Elizabeth-Anne Gumbel QC and Justin Levinson (Barristers for the Claimant, MAGA) MAGA v The Trustees of the Birmingham Archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church [2010] EWCA Civ 256, Court of Appeal (Lord Neuberger MR, Lord Justice Longmore and Lady Justice Smith) (read judgment) This appeal was brought with permission from the trial Judge Mr Justice Jack. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
The intentions of the framers of a given constitutional provision can be formulated as abstract and general principles or as particular expectations with respect to various anticipated applications of the provision. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
On 26 May 2022, Nicklin J heard an application in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:00 am
Law School Applications. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
France Paris Appeal Court: Che Guevara’s portrait: an icon, not a trade mark (Class 46) Germany German banks move towards deal on patent collateralisation (IAM) Munich Regional Court dismisses actor/comedian Michael ‘Bully’ Herbig’s trade mark and personality rights infringement case against Take Two Interactive over ‘Bully – Die Ehrenrunde’ computer game (Class 46) Polar bear Knut and the ‘big… [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
An application for permission to appeal has been lodged in the case of ZXC v Bloomberg. [read post]
25 Nov 2022, 2:37 pm
Smith River, CA. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
On 13 March 2012, Tugendhat J heard an application in Iqbal v Mansoor & ors and gave an ex tempore judgment. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Secondly, the court considered that, while no previous case has directly answered the question raised by the appeal, the cases of Bulman & Dickson v Fenwick & Co [1894] 1 QB 179 and Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1963] AC 691 provided strong implicit support for MUR’s case. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Smith v ADVFN Plc [2010] EWHC 3255 (QB). [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
Cline President and West Virginia Insurance Commissioner National Association of Insurance Commissioners 1124 Smith Street Charleston, West Virginia 25301 Dear Jane: I want to thank the NAIC and its members for the productive September 22 meeting with President Obama and me on the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:24 am
A panel reversed the certification, but the en banc court of appeals reinstated the certification, ruling that “the predominance inquiry should be easily resolved here based on De Beers's conduct and the injury it caused to each and every class member, and that the straightforward application of Rule 23 and our precedent should result in affirming the District Court's order certifying the class. [read post]
