Search for: "State v. Bill" Results 6721 - 6740 of 19,699
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2009, 12:04 pm
He stated that most settle these claims before there is even a suit. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:37 am by Cyberleagle
It brings to mind the comment of Lord Scott in Rusbridger v Attorney-General, a case about the moribund Section 3 of the Treason Felony Act 1848:“[Y]ou do not have to be a very good lawyer to know that to advocate the abolition of the monarchy and its replacement by a republic by peaceful and constitutional means will lead neither to prosecution nor to conviction. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:11 pm
The facility reportedly provided comprehensive medical care to persons claiming to have been injured in motor vehicle accidents and billed New York no-fault insurers for its services. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 1:22 pm by Larry
Like the court in GRK, Customs and Border Protection looked back to an old case call United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 10:22 am by Maira Sutton
The letter states (translated from Spanish): Among the entities affected by the draft bill are museums, archives, and public libraries, as more and more of them digitize their collections and make them publicly available on the Internet. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 10:57 am by Stephen Bilkis
As Held in People v Costello, the law may seek to legislate morality, but it must do so without offending the constitutional protections of the due process clause and the right of privacy. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:16 pm by Bridget Crawford
As states confront what the Dobbs decision will mean for their state laws, shield bills have been enacted to protect against the threat of extra territorial prosecution. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
The Supreme Court of Canada stated (Free World Trust v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:55 pm by National Indian Law Library
(federal fiduciary duty)* State Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured: Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” [See, also, Matter of Council of School Supervisors & Adm'rs, Local 1 v New York City Dept. of Educ., 87 AD3d 883, an entity not a party to a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law may not be bound by its terms.]* See Governor’s Program Bill Mem, Bill Jacket, Chapter 504 of the Laws of, 2009 ** Civil Service Law § 209-a [1] [e]*** Matter of City of Oswego, 21 NY3d 880; Matter of City of Yonkers v Yonkers… [read post]