Search for: "State v. Billings"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 19,726
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court of Canada stated (Free World Trust v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 7:25 am
Group, LLC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 1:06 pm
” United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 2:59 pm
In U.S. ex rel Ruckh v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 12:14 pm
Our amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
” [See, also, Matter of Council of School Supervisors & Adm'rs, Local 1 v New York City Dept. of Educ., 87 AD3d 883, an entity not a party to a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law may not be bound by its terms.]* See Governor’s Program Bill Mem, Bill Jacket, Chapter 504 of the Laws of, 2009 ** Civil Service Law § 209-a [1] [e]*** Matter of City of Oswego, 21 NY3d 880; Matter of City of Yonkers v Yonkers… [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:42 am
Times Democrat Publishing Co. v. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:55 pm
(federal fiduciary duty)* State Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured: Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 6:16 pm
In Marciano v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 4:49 pm
Billing, from 2007. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 2:59 pm
See State Farm v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 12:53 pm
There is already a fair amount of sentiment in the state for civil unions, and there are news reports that passage of a civil union bill in neighboring Oregon may be in the cards this year... [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
"Prosecutors later initiated the civil forfeiture action of United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:24 am
Environmental Protection Agency, where Roberts would have saved the EPA from the state's lawsuit to force it to deal with global warming, and Gonzales v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Clinton v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 9:31 am
The following were added: S.46: A bill to repeal the Klamath Tribe Judgement Fund Act. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:02 am
Fine Art Ltd. v Lacher, 115 AD3d 600, 601 (1st Dept 2014) (“Plaintiffs’ claims of excessive billing and related conduct, which actions are not alleged to have adversely affected their [sic] claims or defenses in the underlying action, do not state a claim for legal malpractice. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:08 am
Plaintiffs states that in response Mr. [read post]
