Search for: "Arthur v. Arthur" Results 661 - 680 of 2,334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2019, 7:20 am by Bridget Crawford
Tomorrow the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in the case of North Carolina Dep't of Revenue v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:46 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Simry’s original ownership structure was as follows: Abe: 50% Abe’s brother, Arthur: 14.5373% Arthur’s daughter, Aileen: 17.73135% Arthur’s daughter, Michelle: 17.73135% The Deal Structure The genesis of the dispute was Abe’s desire to exit the real estate business, disposing of his 50% interest for $80 million. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 8:37 am
Dadante    Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08b0016n.06 In re: Arthur Boyd, Jr. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 6:29 pm
It's a case from down here in San Diego in which the plaintiff, Arthur Stillwell, sued his longtime employer, The Salvation Army, for terminating him notwithstanding an alleged agreement to do so only for good cause. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
We have so far left open the possibility that injuries caused by the intentional acts of a third party might in some cases satisfy the requirements for ADR, and continue to do so today (see Matter of Walsh v Scoppetta, 18 NY3d 850, 852 [2011]; see also McCambridge v McGuire, 62 NY2d 563, 567 [1984] [the focus of the inquiry is on "the precipitating cause of injury"]; Arthur A. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
We have so far left open the possibility that injuries caused by the intentional acts of a third party might in some cases satisfy the requirements for ADR, and continue to do so today (see Matter of Walsh v Scoppetta, 18 NY3d 850, 852 [2011]; see also McCambridge v McGuire, 62 NY2d 563, 567 [1984] [the focus of the inquiry is on "the precipitating cause of injury"]; Arthur A. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:22 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2012); 18 Charles Alan Wright,Arthur R. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:51 am by Marissa Miller
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]