Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W"
Results 661 - 680
of 8,735
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2023, 10:27 am
” Kavanaugh repeated the sentiment in a discussion later with Russell, agreeing that Russell had made “good arguments” about Section 12, but returning to the point that “[w]e don’t have the SEC. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 7:27 am
Supreme Court, which vacated and remanded the matter for reconsideration in light of Shinn v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
Don’t expect to find every aspect of the Bill covered: you won’t find much on age-gating, despite (or perhaps because of) the dominant narrative that the Bill is about protecting children. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 6:12 am
" He'd thought "the George W. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 6:10 am
For the record, the George W. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
Don’t expect to find every aspect of the Bill covered: you won’t find much on age-gating, despite (or perhaps because of) the dominant narrative that the Bill is about protecting children. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
It has been controversial since its predecessor, the Protect America Act, was first passed in 2007 in response to public disclosures of President George W. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 10:01 pm
It matters a lot depends upon the extent of the upzoning, both in depth (how many more units per lot?) [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm
[Bullet speed matters, but so does bullet weight] According to "assault weapon" ban proponents, the AR rifle's lethality is all about how fast its bullets travel. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Gen Z don’t play. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
He writes that “[t]he Court does not second-guess FDA’s decision-making lightly” before doing just that, like saying “No offense, but…” before offending someone. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
For example, in a posting a few years back, our friend and respected colleague Mark Tushnet of the Harvard Law School wrote: [W]hen a raucous crowd shouts down the speaker. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:11 pm
You can understand the reasons for transparency and user efficiency, but putting it into practice is another matter. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm
Thus, the safe harbor comes to an end w/r/t © content. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 1:18 pm
Stringency can thus be non obvious, contested/contestable, and downside risk matters. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
“[W]e focus on whether the reports were accurate reflections of what was said or done. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Active/passive is not an important distinction; notice has to show content is manifestly illegal w/o need of detailed legal examination. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am
Indeed, this might be a problem with the traditional conservative argument that attention to text, original meaning, and tradition will constrain judges: perhaps, realistically, it doesn't actually constrain them. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 7:48 am
What about the copyright interface w/ the DSA? [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 10:02 am
But the theory does not matter. [read post]
