Search for: "JOHN DOES ET. AL."
Results 661 - 680
of 1,472
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2013, 7:01 pm
Patnaude, et al.,; and the Matter of Bordner, et al., where the Commissioner held that where a child is too young to be entitled, as of right, to attend the Public schools of the district, it logically follows that such child is not entitled to transportation to any school. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:56 pm
Rob Fusari et. al. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 12:13 pm
Home, et al., Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiovascular Outcomes in Oral Agent Combination Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes (RECORD), 373 Lancet 2125 (2009). [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
” KSR, 550 U.S. at 417.The appellants lost on a "why not" argument:Appellants contend that “if it was indeed obvious to combine 1L,-21with anti-idiotype antibodies for the treatment of a B cell malignancy, whywould the „024 patent, which was initially filed 10 years after thepublication of Brown et al., fail to mention this possibility? [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
Kenny, et al., Human Effects Advisory Panel, Report of Findings Sticky Shocker Assessment (1999). [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 6:12 am
The UBS “bonus bonds,” which echo a recommendation we made in The Squam Lake Report (French et al, 2010), mitigate these distortions. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Sander Greenland and others have raised various theoretical objections to the argument that relative risks should exceed two before attribution can be made in specific cases. [read post]
24 May 2013, 5:13 am
Warren Hospital, et al. v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 2:01 pm
If not, then what distinguishes Brennan et. al. from the rest of us is not their commitment to social justice but their view of what rights people have. [read post]
12 May 2013, 4:00 am
Christopher John Whaling, et al. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:59 am
There are other books on the Court with a primarily practice-oriented or theoretical focus (such as Stern & Gressman on the practice side as well as a book by Susan Low Bloch et al. on the more theoretical side). [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
VISUAL HEALTH AND SURGICAL CENTER, INC., a Florida corporation, ANTONIO BOLET, individually, Et. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 6:10 am
John Doe 1 et al. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 12:17 pm
Does 1-14, and three other cases, District Judge James S. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:09 pm
United Air Lines, et al., No. 2:10-CV-0190 (D.N.J. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:19 am
[Pagliero et al. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
What does that mean?" [read post]
