Search for: "Lincoln v. United States"
Results 661 - 680
of 791
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:01 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
: Nampak Cartons Ltd v Rapid Action Packaging Ltd (IPKat) (EPLAW) United States US General New US IP enforcement plan may have international impact (IP Watch) US IP Enforcement Coordinator releases ‘2010 Joint Strategic Plan on Intellectual Property Enforcement’ (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Copyrights & Campaigns) (Public Knowledge) (Copyrights & Campaigns) US Patent Reform Rader, Michel weigh in on the… [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
: Nampak Cartons Ltd v Rapid Action Packaging Ltd (IPKat) (EPLAW) United States US General New US IP enforcement plan may have international impact (IP Watch) US IP Enforcement Coordinator releases ‘2010 Joint Strategic Plan on Intellectual Property Enforcement’ (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Copyrights & Campaigns) (Public Knowledge) (Copyrights & Campaigns) US Patent Reform Rader, Michel weigh in on the… [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:53 am
., the president of United States Sugar, and Shannon Estenoz, a board member of the South Florida Water Management District, on the banks of the Loxahatchee River in June 2008. [read post]
26 May 2010, 2:05 pm
The legislative activity stems from the Supreme Court ruling in Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:16 pm
However, the areas covered by the review would be greatly reduced from (1) an evaluation of the technical accomplishments of the Program, including a review of whether the Program has achieved the goals under the metrics established by the Council; (2) a review of the Program’s management and coordination across agencies and disciplines; (3) a review of the funding levels at each agency for the Program’s activities and the ability of each agency to achieve the Program’s… [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:58 pm
Instead, EPA is focusing on the biggest polluters in the United States and asking them to do no more than apply the best available and affordable pollution controls, something that they’ve done for decades on other pollutants. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:22 am
” United States courts have long struggled to differentiate patentable inventions from ordinary innovation. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:44 am
In the context of speech writing, famous people, such as the President of the United States, have speech writers, but "pass off" the speech as their own. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 10:10 am
"The basic defect of the Adam Walsh Act, as applied, is that it imposes a mandatory limit on freedom of an accused without permitting an 'adversary hearing,'" Weinstein held in United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 8:36 am
NEC Corp., 931 F.2d 1493, 1496-98 (11th Cir. 1991) and United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 8:24 am
Is the State suing the United States for a declaratory judgment? [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 7:27 am
United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
GenOway v S.A. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:35 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP) United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
