Search for: "Scales v. Scales"
Results 661 - 680
of 6,397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 3:55 pm
Trump v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 8:18 am
Filing fees were increased in an apparent attempt to deter applicants from delaying the filing of divisionals, but the sliding scale of EUR 210 (for a divisional filed within 2 years) to EUR850 (for a divisional filed at 5 years +) is hardly an effective sanction. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:23 am
Vimeo, Mezey v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:24 pm
The United States Supreme Court of Appeals heard oral arguments today in Caperton v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:04 am
Rory Thomson, a senior associate in the Insurance and Reinsurance Group at CMS, previews the appeal pending in the case of Edwards v Hugh James Ford Simey (a firm). [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 1:26 pm
The post Lackey v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:18 am
Salary upon appointmentGolanec v Culross, 272 AD2d 471Rye police officer Jeffrey Golanec claimed that in consideration of his experience as a police officer, he was entitled to be appointed at a higher salary step of the salary grade of his position rather than at the entrance level rate.The Appellate Division, sustaining a lower court ruling, pointed out that Golanec failed to prove that other police officers with the same or similar training and experience as police officers were… [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:09 pm
Today, in Ahousaht Indian Band and Nation v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
In Anadarko Petroleum Corp. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:06 am
The case, Zimmerman v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:26 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 12:01 pm
Bethesda Softworks LLC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 6:29 am
Milward v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:44 pm
In today’s case (Sauer v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 12:04 pm
June 28, 2012), the $4.85 million agreement in EEOC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 12:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:34 am
Under the Supreme Court's ruling in Garcetti v. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 6:51 am
In Teva v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 2:58 am
" Citigroup Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:04 pm
Per Thom’s comment below, it looks like the thrust of the complaint is not the price hike which would be ruled out by Trinko, but exclusive search syndication arrangements allegedly entered into by Google with highly trafficked websites like AOL which deprive rivals of the opportunity to compete for minimum efficient scale. [read post]
