Search for: "Sweet v State" Results 661 - 680 of 993
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
SG and 35 state AGs have weighed in claiming that data mining does not merit First Amendment protection. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
For instance, experiments with caramel odor, which is related to sweet taste, demonstrated a suppression of sour taste intensity and peanut butter odor suppressed whipped cream sweetness. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:41 am by Mirriam Seddiq
  Speaking of dead and communication.In a decision that basically all but over-ruled their decision in Crawford v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
Although the analysis focuses on the history of patent law in the United States, it develops themes that illuminate the evolution of patent regimes in Europe [In this regard, the US is the sun to Europe's moon. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm by Stephen Page
In other words: evidence of lies in the proceedings, a costs order must be made.Justice Boland stated the approach to be taken on costs:The relevant provisions of the Act are s 117, s 117AB and s 117C. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 5:23 am by NL
The cases are not available on bailii yet, or apparently elsewhere, but are reported in Sweet & Maxwell's Housing View and I've seen transcripts. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 5:23 am by NL
The cases are not available on bailii yet, or apparently elsewhere, but are reported in Sweet & Maxwell's Housing View and I've seen transcripts. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am by Kelly
Mattel (IPKat) Pacific Rim Winemakers – Joyous trademark dispute pits ‘Sweet Bliss’ against ‘Bliss’: Pacific Rim Winemakers, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Morge (FC) (Appellant) v Hampshire County Council (Respondent) on appeal from [2010] EWCA Civ 608- Read judgment We cannot drive a coach-and-horses through natural habitats without a bit of soul-searching, says the Supreme Court . [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:22 am by admin
Judge Robert Sweet of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York stated in the case of Sharkey v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:57 am
The company was found to have violated the state's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.Speaking strictly off the record, the spokesperson expressed regret that WIPO had been slow to comment on the IPKat's posts on this matter, but "this should by no means be misinterpreted as a lack of concern or inaction". [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:19 am by emagraken
  Thus, the issue in each case is the state of mind of these defendants. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 9:53 am by azatty
Beery, Deputy JUDGE PENDLETON GAINES FILED: 07/21/2006 PHYSICIANS CHOICE OF ARIZONA INC. v. [read post]