Search for: "Tuning v. Tuning" Results 661 - 680 of 4,682
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2021, 9:30 am by Chris Castle
Stay tuned, the 99ers are back in the Wild West this time with added Ether. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
Myers, Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Arconti v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 3:55 pm by CAFE
  Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Matthew Billy – Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial Producer REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS:  VOTE for Stay Tuned with Preet at the Webby Awards The New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 1:53 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
This intimate connection between article 3(a) and article 3(c) – both hinging on the interpretation of “product” in article 1 – calls for an explicit fine-tuning of the CJEU’s case law on article 3(c) to make it consistent with its latest case law on article 3(a): Teva et altri v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:52 am by Nedim Malovic
According to case law, that fact alone is, in principle, liable to create both a strong visual and phonetic similarity between the marks at issue (For Tune v EUIPO (T‑815/16)).Secondly, although, as the applicant had claimed, the relevant public normally attaches greater importance to the first part of words, this does not apply in all cases, nor does it call into question the principle that the examination of the similarity of trade marks must take into account the overall… [read post]