Search for: "U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board"
Results 661 - 680
of 867
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2012, 9:11 am
.” In Editorial board muddles definition of justice, I noted that the Minnesota Daily had argued in an editorial that the United States should join the International Criminal Court because that deferential act would promote “international justice.” I argued that by cloaking its value-laden argument in vague concepts of “international justice” and promoting a “just world,” the Daily was attempting to insulate its policy… [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:02 pm
First American Title Insurance Company, 2012 U.S. [read post]
Arrested For Online Solicitation of a Minor? The Right Houston Criminal Lawyer Can Make a Difference
24 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
Community involvement, parental supervision, and early intervention and prevention programs on Internet safety are essential in protecting children from online solicitation and exposure to pornography. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 8:26 am
To that end, the Supreme Court concluded that it is “fairly discernable” from the CSRA’s text, structure and purpose that Congress intended that petitioners must first bring their claims to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), rather than District Court, even if the MSPB cannot declare a law unconstitutional. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 8:24 am
Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), Ms. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
The First Look ICANN is scheduled to post a list of the 1,900-plus new gTLD applications, who applied for each string, and applicants' answers to the many “public” questions—such as the purpose of the string, plans for rights protection mechanisms, WHOIS policies, and many other factors. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:57 am
Department of Treasury, in which the Court held that the Merit Systems Protection Board is the exclusive forum for judicial review of adverse employment action against government employees covered by the Civil Service Reform Act. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:15 am
Department of the Treasury, in which the Court held that the Merit Systems Protection Board provided the exclusive forum for judicial review of adverse employment action against government employees covered by the Civil Service Reform Act, including when the employees bring constitutional claims that the MPSB lacks the authority to decide. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:30 am
By a vote of 6-3, the Court held that constitutional challenges to an administrative agency's dismissal decision must be brought before the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), along with any statutory or other claims, rather than as freestanding claims in federal district court--even though the MSPB interprets its own jurisdiction as not extending to constitutional challenges. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 10:12 am
The Merit Systems Protection Board provides the exclusive avenue of judicial review for federal employees’ adverse employment action challenges, even when those employees argue that a federal statute is unconstitutional, the U.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 10:13 am
The Supreme Court held today that a federal government employee covered by the Civil Service Reform Act must bring employment claims before the Merit Systems Protection Board, rather than district court.The MSPB is the exclusive forum, even if the employee is raising a constitutional law claim, and even if the employee is ineligible for federal employment. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 6:56 pm
The U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:59 am
The Federal Circuit has finally put to rest the unfortunate practice of judges at the Merit System Protection Board (MSPB) of allowing the agency to "prove" that they would have fired the whistleblower anyway, and then never hearing the whistleblower's side of the story. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:30 am
The United States Merit Systems Protection Board [Board] determined that Molina-Crespo violated the federal Hatch Act [5 U.S.C. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:04 pm
While no system or standard is by any means perfect and many are terribly flawed, they should not be ignored by an organization’s leaders. [read post]
24 May 2012, 12:42 pm
Bottini and Goeke, who were Alaska-based prosecutors at the time of the Stevens trial, have the option to appeal the misconduct finding to the Merit System Protection Board. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:02 am
The U.S. [read post]
20 May 2012, 1:11 pm
Can you give us your take on this and does litigation to protect intellectual property rights stifle innovation? [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:12 pm
Merit Systems Protection Board, 112 LRP 16856 (D.D.C. 2012), the U.S. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:54 am
In two landmark decisions last week, the federal Merit System Protection Board (MSPB) held that it does have the authority to enforce the procedural protections for federal employees who suffer adverse employment actions as a result of issues with their security clearances. [read post]
