Search for: "USA v. Cross" Results 661 - 680 of 741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2019, 11:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
It gets more complex when cross border jurisdictions are involved.This is an issue for liability insurance underwriting anywhere in the world. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm by Schachtman
”[1] Did Judge Milazzo engage in judicial dodging with rejecting the relevancy argument and emphasizing the truism that Sanofi could highlight the discrepancy on cross-examination? [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:08 am by Nancy E. Halpern, DVM, Esq.
The World Health Organization recommends that when dogs cross international borders, national importing authorities should require an international veterinary certificate attesting that the animal did not show signs of rabies at the time of shipment, was permanently identified, vaccinated, or revaccinated, and had been subjected to a serologic test for rabies before shipment (1). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:47 am by Jan von Hein
Kern, Judicial protection against torpedo actions In the recent case Weber v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
Google: Judge Appoints a Damages Expert  In the Oracle v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:22 am
And it will probably be the only decision about the RCD to be made by a judge who got to see expert evidence subject to cross-examination, since OHIM and continental European courts do not, so far as this spectral moggy knows, cross-examine experts. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
And it will probably be the only decision about the RCD to be made by a judge who got to see expert evidence subject to cross-examination, since OHIM and continental European courts do not, so far as this spectral moggy knows, cross-examine experts. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:22 am
And it will probably be the only decision about the RCD to be made by a judge who got to see expert evidence subject to cross-examination, since OHIM and continental European courts do not, so far as this spectral moggy knows, cross-examine experts. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:00 am by Administrator
In this paper, I describe these pathways as taken (or attempted) in five common law jurisdictions (USA, UK Australia, New Zealand, and Canada) and reflect briefly on lessons that can be drawn from the recent experiences with law reform in Canada. [read post]