Search for: "WHITE v. STATE" Results 6781 - 6800 of 11,994
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2019, 9:32 am by John Jascob
That motion alleges that the CFTC violated the consent order settling the case and should be held in contempt or subject to sanctions (CFTC v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 10:59 am by Tom Kosakowski
 The new policy was prompted in part by an investigation by Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights and a report by the California State Auditor.The policy states in relevant parts:H. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing see Harrington v City of New York, 157 AD3d 582, the Appellate Division said although Plaintiff's claim "sufficiently pleaded the first two [the four required] elements of discrimination, i.e. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing see Harrington v City of New York, 157 AD3d 582, the Appellate Division said although Plaintiff's claim "sufficiently pleaded the first two [the four required] elements of discrimination, i.e. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 11:30 am by Smita Ghosh
”In the London Review of Books, Andrew Bacevich covers The General v. the President: MacArthur and Truman at the Brink of Nuclear War by H.W. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 11:30 am by Lowell Brown
Updegrove, the director of the LBJ Presidential Library, will speak about Johnson’s civil rights achievements June 27 in Austin as part of the State Bar’s Annual Meeting. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:54 am by Karen Gullo
According to the amended complaint,  a SMUD analyst who provided data to police excluded homes in a predominantly white neighborhood. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:45 am by Jeremy
Member States may however allow a work to be used, without its author’s consent, for the purpose of caricature, parody or pastiche. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:05 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
” On the U.S. end, the White House firmly believed that the review would “demonstrate the strength of the American promise to protect the personal data on citizens of both sides of the Atlantic,” stated White House press secretary Sarah Sanders. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:13 am by jonathanturley
Brooks was criticizing gun rights generally and, by extension, the Second Amendment decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 10:14 am
  The Supreme Court addressed the issue in 1986, in the case of Ford v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:05 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
” On the U.S. end, the White House firmly believed that the review would “demonstrate the strength of the American promise to protect the personal data on citizens of both sides of the Atlantic,” stated White House press secretary Sarah Sanders. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 9:12 am
"Let the stupidity begin...The Separate But Equal Act was set forth in Marbury v. [read post]