Search for: "State v. Dollar"
Results 6821 - 6840
of 9,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
The Indian Satellite Saga and Retaliation: Recognizing the Supreme Court of India’s Judgment Abroad?
24 Jun 2024, 7:03 pm
Both tribunals rejected, at least in part, India’s defense that it had annulled the Satellite Agreement to protect essential security interests.[7] The three arbitration tribunals rendered billion-dollar awards in favor of Devas and its investors.[8] Devas and its investors have started to enforce these awards against Indian assets abroad. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
The account at issue in Madden v Midland involved an open-end credit card plan (aka credit card account) and the account was not sold by Bank of America to an unaffiliated national bank, contrary representation by the Curious authors notwithstanding. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 11:26 pm
Apple's lawyers did that in 2012 and got a billion-dollar award. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 7:22 am
Some like holes in the groundLong v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am
Jonathan V. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Court of Appeals deferred to PERB’s expertise with respect to its holding the employer had engaged in an improper employer practice but ruled its remedy was unreasonableTown of Islip v New York State Pub. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:40 am
In Cariou v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:33 am
As a result, the Apple v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 10:00 pm
In the case of 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm
Cariou’s pictures of Rastafarians as the basis for a series of paintings that sold for millions of dollars. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 12:24 am
By Nicole KilloranLathrop et al. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 7:02 am
" And then they quote from a decision the District Court of Massachusetts made in August 2016 in Esoterix v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:42 am
The case, AF Holdings v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:50 am
Apple's previous appeal related only to the denial of a permanent injunction, not to infringement, validity or damages issues.The patents at issue in that case (this is still the first Apple v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:53 pm
In our view, its claims are clearly ineligible for patent protection under Alice v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 7:31 pm
But at least in the United States, our rights are not so much stolen from us as they are simply lost by us. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 4:30 am
That is to say, we very much like the recent case of Smith v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 7:15 pm
by Sara PulsHerald v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 6:48 am
Avalos v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:32 pm
Reaching consistency throughout the different states seems unlikely. [read post]
