Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 6821 - 6840
of 29,473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2010, 12:51 pm
The Supreme Court recently decided Samantar v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 2:06 pm
In the wake of the McNeely decision, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in November 2014 in State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm
The Court states that the level of retail charges for international roaming services, when the regulation was adopted, was high and the relationship between costs and charges was not such as would prevail in fully competitive markets. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
The program regulates underground storage tanks containing petroleum products and certain hazardous substances, and is primarily administered at the state level. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
It found that a decision issued in March 2015, State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 12:54 pm
Tulane Law Review, Vol. 82, No. 1, 2008).The ISF is organized as a state owned enterprise. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 6:40 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 11:41 am
Supreme Court made clear in Riley v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:57 am
Yesterday, in Chavez-Meza v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 6:41 pm
Bohling and then reinforced in 2004 in State v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 2:00 am
State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 11:58 am
Counsel, 471 U.S. 626, 628 (1985) [4] Central Hudson v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 10:34 am
Counsel, 471 U.S. 626, 628 (1985) [4] Central Hudson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:03 am
Kathryn Stebner -- a San Francisco attorney who is working on the new cases -- said lawyers have used state data to identify nursing home chains and facilities that provide inadequate staffing levels. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:33 pm
Here is a link to the complaint Nevada v. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 6:25 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 7:33 am
In Connecticut v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 7:42 am
Facts: This case (Miami Valley Fair Housing Center Inc et al v. [read post]
