Search for: "State v. Losee" Results 6821 - 6840 of 14,485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
 In some cases, off-label use constitutes the standard of care.Id. at 938-39 (a half-dozen footnotes, including to Bexis’ 1998 article, omitted).Since we litigators use law review articles the way a drunk uses a lamppost – for support rather than illumination – we start to lose interest once the article shifts from “what is” to “what should be. [read post]
14 May 2015, 4:07 am
This approach leads to two failures.First, the Court loses an opportunity to underscore administrative failures. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:04 pm by Nate Russell
Very interesting cases like R v Nde Soh, 2014 NBQB 20, which deals with the distinction of “real” versus “documentary” electronic evidence under the Canada Evidence Act, or Fric v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
”  (iii)  Bregenz players A.T., D.G. and A.I. were bribed €60,000 for their team to lose three matches. [read post]
11 May 2015, 12:18 am by Steve Baird
Now, thanks to the recent Supreme Court decision in B&B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:56 am
  The exceedingly long decision of the court in Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 5:21 am
A party may also move for summary judgment in order to eliminate the risk of losing at trial, and possibly avoid having to go through discovery . . . [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am by Schachtman
Another trouble with enemies is that they sometimes develop into friends and lose a good deal of their zeal. [read post]
7 May 2015, 5:33 am by Amy Howe
” At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen analyzes last week’s decision in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 9:28 am
” That same phrase also appears in the Unemployment Compensation Law, for folks who lose their jobs through no fault of their own (having nothing to do with work injuries). [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
The Court also asked the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Nebraska v. [read post]