Search for: "In re Roberts" Results 6841 - 6860 of 13,417
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2009, 2:23 am
But just in case you're thinking "Come on Rumpole, give Carney a break. [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Schneiderman announced the arrest of and unsealing of a 35-count indictment against Robert H. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:44 am by Carter Scott
In a landscape where public roads have become testing grounds for companies like Tesla, and with pointed concerns from NTSB’s Robert Sumwalt about such practices, we’re left to ponder the adequacy of our regulatory frameworks. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:24 pm
We're led into this debate by Grammarian extraordinaire Jonathan M. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 1:00 am by Robert Elliott, J.D.
"It doesn't matter whether you're a born Albertan or from Ontario or from another country,'' he said. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:04 pm
The speakers are Rabbi Dovid Roberts (a JABE consultant and expert on business ethics) and IPKat team member Jeremy. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am by Ronald Mann
… [W]hat you’re suggesting to us is that they don’t have a right to say the plan is violating a bunch of other provisions of the Code … I’ve just never heard of parsing standing in that way. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:37 am by Rich McHugh
(If you’re interested, you can listen to yesterday’s oral arguments or download the transcrip from The Supreme Court’s website.) [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 10:39 am by Kevin
As you know, a judge held that former presidential candidate Robert F. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 4:19 am by Alfred Brophy
 I've crossed paths with Robert Strange before, as a graduation speaker at UNC. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:21 pm by Edward Hartnett
  Chief Justice Roberts, as well as Justices Scalia, Alito, and Kagan seemed quite skeptical of that view, as did (to a lesser extent) Justices  Kennedy and Sotomayor. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm by David Zaring
  Political science is a bit more heterogeneous, but APSR is almost exclusively the domain of quantitative empiricists, leading some in that field to observe, as Brian Leiter did yesterday re empirical legal studies, that the field is risking becoming arcane and narrow (here's Josh Wright and Professor Bainbridge on it too). [read post]