Search for: "State v. Gaines" Results 6841 - 6860 of 9,727
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2022, 4:57 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
With respect to the exculpatory agreement, the Court ruled: Although Adam states, in conclusory fashion, that ‘Libra and Anderson have taken such action in bad faith and intentionally with full knowledge that their action constituted misconduct in knowing violation of the law and for the improper purpose of personally gaining financial profits and advantages to which they are not entitled,’ Adam pleads no facts that would permit such inferences to be drawn. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:14 pm by Randy Barnett
Before last week, I know of no legal authority in the United States who claimed to hold this position. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:21 pm by Erik Gerding
Less regulated and unsubsidized firms may gain if they can make investments that regulated firms cannot. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 3:52 pm by Sheppard Mullin
United States, 435 U.S. 679, 692 (1978) (test for per se illegality); accord State Oil Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 7:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Such a ruling would allow the University . . ., as assignee, to gain access to all patent applications filed by the defendants in the United States Patent and Trademark Office and to take such actions in the Patent Office as might be needed to protect its rights. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 3:25 pm
The issue can be stated simply: did Congress act unconstitutionally in 1996 when it passed a law strictly curbing the power of federal courts to overturn state criminal convictions? [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 3:52 pm by Sheppard Mullin
United States, 435 U.S. 679, 692 (1978) (test for per se illegality); accord State Oil Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 3:31 pm by Eric Goldman
By mandating TOS enforcement, states can effectively gain unprecedented access to an online publisher’s editorial decisions. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 1:58 pm by Robin E. Shea
Stated another way, Does it make sense to enforce the no-grazing rule — even though it is a perfectly legitimate rule — against this 18-year employee for eating half of a $1.37 bag of potato chips* because her blood sugar was low? [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 6:27 am by Ted Frank
The structural problem of states acting to expropriate the gains of interstate commerce for themselves continues today. [read post]