Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 6881 - 6900 of 19,609
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
He was wrong that that case should stand in the way of Congress, but he was wrong in a way that is both understandable and that might point to a way for motivated Supreme Court conservatives to block Congress’s possible future policy choice.In 1920, the Supreme Court held 5-4 in favor of the taxpayer in the now-infamous Eisner v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:36 am by Charon QC
A recent Telegraph article on Asbestos claims arising from a landmark legal decision of Sienkiewicz v Greif and Knowsley MBC v Willmore is a case in point. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 2:24 pm
  Still, I believe he'd choose access to the justice system over its alternatives.Though Mr. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:54 am by SHG
  The bad news is that they're still children, which is what makes the decision in Brown (having replaced Schwarzenegger) v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:15 am by Dan Bressler
After years of ethical scandals surrounding the justices, there are still many open questions over when the justices need to recuse and how that decision is made. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm by stevemehta
Cox in July 2008, he found that she still suffered from peripheral vascular disease. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 7:32 am by Florian Mueller
ZTE case law of the European Court of Justice was subsequently adopted by one Mannheim division, then adopted by the Federal Court of Justice, and meanwhile all German courts including the Dusseldorf Regional Court faithfully apply Sisvel v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
In light of the five-year anniversary of the Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court bench refused to grant federal prosecutors a wider berth in trying allegedly criminal tax behavior, but the court’s interpretation of a tax felony statute may still be vague enough to lead to convictions for lesser violations. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm by Schachtman
Justice Walters rejected the suggestion that a meta-analysis with a p-value of 6.5% should be disregarded, but the court’s discussion skirts the question whether and how the Cochrane data can be sufficient to support a conclusion of ACS efficacy. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 7:47 am
As detailed here at SCOTUSblog, the Supreme Court issued just one opinion today from a case that was argued only last month, Gonzales v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 5:17 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: We are coming upon the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Supreme Court's opinion in Batson v. [read post]