Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 6881 - 6900
of 16,399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2012, 7:59 am
They have also created strong encouragement for prosecutors (long the biggest bar to strong privacy protections) to make a deal. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
KG v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm
Enjoy.JUSTICE K.Section [X] of BUSL v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 2:00 am
[3] People v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 9:40 am
” Our strong presumption flows from copyright law’s asymmetric recoveries. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm
(Full disclosure: I was happy to write an enthusiastic Foreword to the book, and Balkinization regular Mark Graber also contributed a strong blurb, as did University of Virginia history professor emeritus Peter Onuf.In some ways, the book can be compared to the Declaration of Independence. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 10:58 am
Krishnan v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 11:56 am
They mostly have been very strong preemption decisions and this month’s addition to the collection is no exception – Cook v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 9:03 am
Newsom v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 6:23 am
See Reynolds v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 10:58 am
Krishnan v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 12:00 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 3:01 pm
County (2013) and NFIB v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
In Patchak v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:10 am
Mr Justice Mellor accepted that a commercially driven mindset is a relevant aspect of the common general knowledge of the Skilled Person, but if it prevents the skilled person from implementing a technically obvious idea it must be strong (see Koninklijke Philips NV v Asustek Computer Corp [2019] EWCA Civ 2230). [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:22 pm
Finally, in State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 6:11 am
The recent Supreme Court decision in Rent-A-Center v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:38 am
See, e.g., Olsen v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 2:16 pm
A strong case for injunctive relief does not require a substantial showing of harm from a denial of that relief.1. [read post]
