Search for: "John Does 5"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 8,657
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
The first seven counts involved allegations of sexual assault against Jane Doe I, a.k.a. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 4:21 pm
The Court's claim is that the Civil Rights Act of 1866 protects Second Amendment rights even though, unlike the Freedman's Bureau Act, it does not explicitly mention the right to bear arms. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:51 pm
In John and Jane Doe's cases, they won't be going to Jail. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 11:41 am
Similar results are observed in Europe, with 13% and 5%, respectively.Why do people want to buy? [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
" DOE v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:24 pm
Filing a Board appeal does not, unto itself, entitle an appellant to de novo review of all aspects of a rejection. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 6:54 am
And even though Paul was my favorite, thank you John (and whoever wrote "Marching to Pretoria") for today's post title. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:53 pm
TTAB Posts April 2010 Hearing ScheduleText and photos ©John L. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:51 am
However, when pondering exactly which Judge Hamilton made the original order in Re B, Lord Justice Ward did give a descriptive mention of Judge Donald Hamilton (presumably the same one): "We are told it is neither Judge Donald Hamilton, he of imposing physique, who sits a great deal in Birmingham and Coventry, nor is it His Honour Judge John Hamilton who ordinarily sits in Luton. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Does 1-9 (Columbus, Ohio)John Doe #1 Motion to Quash*John Doe #9 Motion to Dismiss Complaint, Vacate Order, Quash Subpoena*John Doe #9 Motion for Stay*John Doe #5 Motion to Dismiss Complaint, Vacate Order, Quash Subpoena*John Doe #5 Motion for Stay*November 29, 2007, Order Granting Stay of Subpoena*RIAA Opposition Memo*Defendants' Reply Memo*April 18, 2008, Order and Opinion of… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:35 pm
The bottom line: state college leaders may reserve official status on campus to groups that admit all comers, provided that the policy genuinely seeks and promotes that aim and does not single out any group because of what it believes. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:38 pm
It was a ”5-4? [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:03 pm
MARCIA COYLE: Yes, it does. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm
The bill establishes a residential and commercial retrofit program with target retrofit rates of 5% and 2%, respectively. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:11 pm
The Supreme Court’s Opinion In a 5-4 majority opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court focused on the Sarbanes Oxley’s Act’s provisions for the removal of the PCAOB members. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
McChesney and Nation editor John Nichols. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:58 am
It appears that Stevens does think that business method patents are a problem, but couldn't convince a fifth member of the Court to agree. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:47 am
I agree with John's comments there. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:25 am
One wonders how many times the combination of Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer and Sotomayor ( Souter ) with Scalia has shown up in 5-4 votes? [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:44 am
” The article was based on an interview with three Supervisory Patent Examiners (SPEs): David Ometz, John Cottingham and Andrew Koenig. [read post]
