Search for: "State v. Childs"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 18,909
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
An individual or organization must have “standing” in order to maintain an Article 78 action challenging an administrative decisionThomas v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2016 NY Slip Op 02154, Appellate Division, First DepartmentMichael P. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:24 am
But across half the states, 36 million people are in danger of losing that right after the Supreme Court’s shameful decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 8:10 am
In State of Tennessee v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
On June 21, federal authorities filed a Superseding Indictment (full text) adding two defendants in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:25 pm
That was the case in State of Missouri v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
In the wake of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 2:04 pm
The 6-3 ruling came in MetLife v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 6:31 pm
It's kind of a funny story because it's true:Robert Loblaw points to a recent 4th Circuit case, U.S. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 9:28 am
Recently this issue has come to a head in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in two cases, In re Amy Unknown, No. 09-41238, and United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 4:05 pm
Here is the abstract: In Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:33 pm
In Toland v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:33 pm
In Toland v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:03 am
State of Haryana [(2008) 4 SCC 70], held that the payments which are customary payments, for example, given at the time of birth of a child or other ceremonies as are prevalent in the society or families to the marriage, would not be covered under the expression ‘dowry’. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 3:11 pm
In Kessler v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
See Velasquez v. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 5:32 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 1:57 pm
United States (Indian Commerce Clause)Whiteagle v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 3:44 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: The Supreme Court Is No Safe Haven for Abortion Rights
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
