Search for: "Thomas v. State" Results 6901 - 6920 of 15,510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Edison as a patent troll, re-visited in 2016
26 Jan 2016, 10:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"The demise of the MPPC happened in United States v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
May 2010 KSC docket
25 Mar 2010, 8:46 am by Randall Hodgkinson
State, No. 101,078 (Shawnee)State appeal (transfer)Jean K. [read post]
Kansas Defenders - http://kansasdefenders.blogspot.com/
Tennessee opposes same-sex marriage review (UPDATED)
15 Dec 2014, 2:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Tennessee case is Tanco v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Confrontation, Hearsay, and Child Abuse
21 Nov 2014, 2:51 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  In Davis v. [read post]
Crime and Consequences - http://www.crimeandconsequences.com/crimblog/
How Many Votes To Overrule The Slaughterhouse Cases?
17 Nov 2009, 8:46 pm
 Justice Thomas more or less took Gura’s position in his dissent in Saenz v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://volokh.com
Symposium: The court continues winding down unnecessary racial redistricting
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm by Richard Pildes
Alabama and Alabama Democratic Conference v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
In order to qualify for retirement benefits under Retirement and Social Security Law Article 15, an applicant for such benefits must demonstrate that he or she actually retired from public service employment in the first instance
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided and Entered:May 30, 2024 CV-23-1429 [*1]In the Matter of David Strzepek, Petitioner, v Thomas P. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
In order to qualify for retirement benefits under Retirement and Social Security Law Article 15, an applicant for such benefits must demonstrate that he or she actually retired from public service employment in the first instance
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided and Entered:May 30, 2024 CV-23-1429 [*1]In the Matter of David Strzepek, Petitioner, v Thomas P. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Infringers Must Show Patent Invalidity Clearly and Convincingly, Supreme Court Holds
9 Jun 2011, 2:51 pm by Barry Barnett
Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. [read post]
Blawgletter - http://blawgletter.typepad.com/bbarnett/
U.S. Supreme Court Victory for T-Mobile
14 Jan 2015, 8:17 am by Jennifer R. Dixon
Supreme Court issued an opinion in T-Mobile South, LLC v. [read post]
Appealing Decisions - http://www.flaappellatecounsel.com/
US Supreme Court reinforces criminal defendant right to cross-examine witnesses
21 Jan 2022, 8:37 am by Lauren Ban | U. Pittsburgh School of Law, US
The case, Hemphill v. [read post]
JURIST - Paper Chase - https://www.jurist.org/news/
Supreme Court: Background Investigations on Federal Contract Employees OK
19 Jan 2011, 4:59 pm by HR Hero
Wednesday, in NASA v. [read post]
Human Resources News - http://employmentlawpost.com/hrnews
[Orin Kerr] Scalia questions the value of “modern” Restatements
24 Feb 2015, 10:50 pm
In Tuesday’s original jurisdiction opinion, Kansas v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Legal scholarship: First Statute of Westminster [1275] is cited in attorney's brief
19 Feb 2009, 4:35 am
Legal scholarship: First Statute of Westminster [1275] is cited in attorney's briefAmalfitano v Rosenberg, 2009 NY Slip Op 01069, Decided on February 12, 2009, Court of AppealsPrecedents and legislative history are frequently referred to in briefs and court decisions. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - http://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
BREAKING: SCOTUS Holds that Oral Complaints Receive Retaliation Protection Under FLSA
23 Mar 2011, 2:21 am
Earlier today, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Kasten v. [read post]
Lawffice Space - http://www.lawfficespace.com/
Excellent Dicta!
1 Jul 2008, 2:49 pm
Earlier this term, the Supreme Court handed down Sprint v. [read post]
Supreme Dicta - http://www.supremedicta.com/
Racial Discrimination Laws Narrowed Following Supreme Court Decision
30 Jun 2009, 2:50 pm
In a 5 to 4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled on the controversial Ricci v. [read post]
New York Employment Attorneys Blog - http://www.newyorkemploymentattorneysblog.com/
New data shows Supreme Court ideology continues to lean conservative
17 Jul 2023, 7:55 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Why it matters: After overturning Roe v. [read post]
beSpacific - http://www.bespacific.com/
In Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program, Anti-Union Views Are Not Religious Beliefs
31 Mar 2011, 8:58 am by Howard Friedman
In Best Wood Judge Firewood and Tree Service v. [read post]
Religion Clause - http://religionclause.blogspot.com/
Piccadilly Post-op
17 Jun 2008, 8:28 pm
The short answer: On a heavily textualist analysis, Justice Thomas, writing for the majority (Breyer and Stevens dissenting), holds that the tax exemption is available only for sales after plan confirmation. [read post]
Credit Slips - http://www.creditslips.org/creditslips/