Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 6921 - 6940
of 13,232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2014, 7:26 am
For example, research shows that price signals trigger negative emotional reactions that mitigate consumers’ desires for the advertised products. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
In January 2012, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:36 am
Issues like federalism and state action doctrine do bear on 1A issues. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 3:32 am
Take, for example, Sieger v Zak in which each side challenged the adequacy of the other’s expert disclosure in a case involving damages claims arising from a shareholder buy-out. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 2:20 am
In MidAtlantic International Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 7:31 pm
The price of freedom is not only vigilance but also participation. ... [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:59 pm
On Tuesday, United States District Judge Roslynn Mauskopf issued a ruling that sharply criticized NYPD officers Javier Velez and Konrad Zadiewicz for fabricating evidence and lying to the Court, and suppressed the seizure of a gun from one Martese Price. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:59 pm
On Tuesday, United States District Judge Roslynn Mauskopf issued a ruling that sharply criticized NYPD officers Javier Velez and Konrad Zadiewicz for fabricating evidence and lying to the Court, and suppressed the seizure of a gun from one Martese Price. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 7:39 am
In a 4-3 per curiam decision, the Louisiana Supreme Court in Ramanda Houston v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:01 am
Evil-like price of $100 billion, then is the theoretical choice still a “realistic” one?) [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:35 am
Central planning, not the welfare state, is what was incompatible with individual liberty. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 1:12 pm
The Board is to adopt an average return of at least the Consumer Price Index (CPI) + 4.5 to + 5.5 per cent per annum over the long term as the benchmark return on the Fund. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:31 am
Galaria v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
Lamb and The Episcopal Church v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
Sprint states that it subsidizes the cost of the new Phones for the benefit of its "legitimate" customers. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
For example, under the doctrine set forth in the 1979 case of United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 3:41 pm
Vons Cos. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:06 am
Indeed, the very definition of Promote states that it is “determined under Sections 6.1 (a)(iii)-(v). [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:01 am
Perhaps the most important exclusion from patentability, discussed further below, is India’s Section 3(d).The authors cited Pfizer v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 12:19 am
Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
