Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 6961 - 6980
of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2013, 11:00 pm
It "does not disagree that certain claims may now be deemed final under Rule 54(b)". [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 2:30 pm
B. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 6:30 am
Editor: Duke T. [read post]
20 May 2019, 3:25 pm
Markham,485 So. 2d 1299, 1300 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986) (“to lump all decision-making authority in one party for all matters, undermines the mandate of the law that decisions be "jointly made," unless there is a finding as required pursuant to section 61.13(2)(b)2”); Wheeler v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:58 am
But in the future what Justice Kennedy is thinking may matter a lot. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:45 pm
If you have any questions on the subject matter below, do not hesitate to reach out. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:34 am
" Last week, I wrote about early motions to dismiss employment lawsuits under Rule 12(b)(6) and questioned whether they were always the best strategy for the employer. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 8:12 am
Maybe that just isn't feasible any longer, given contemporary realities. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
The proper agent for service of process for litigation against the Receiver is: Donald B. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm
UnumProvident Corp., 464 F.3d 1260, 1272 (11th Cir. 2006) (“Under § 1292(b), appellate review, even for certified questions, is discretionary . . . . [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 8:24 am
Authentication is “evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Whether a particular warning should have been in a different location, in pictures, in bright red, or in a different language frankly doesn’t matter nearly as much when the warning’s intended recipient is a prescribing physician. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
It Don't Mean A Thing If It Ain't Got That Swing On 06/28/10, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Bilski v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:44 am
§ 841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(C). [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:33 am
But it is the glide path on which the parties find themselves, and you wouldn’t put even money on their changing course. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
I don’t want to jump into the debate about whether or not such a rule is the right rule as a matter of legal policy. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
Matthew discussed the survey in more depth in his post here: At the trial, “two matters of significance to [the last] appeal occurred,” according to the Second Circuit. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:28 am
We're used to being told, 'Here is A and B, what does it get you? [read post]
27 May 2013, 5:42 am
We don’t ask how many people actually saw/heard other forms of broadcast advertising), it wasn’t an ad and thus AFL’s summary judgment motion had to be denied. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 10:17 pm
I suppose we shouldn’t be surprised that matters didn’t get set aright instantly with Crawford.By the way, the Nessons claim coherence as one of the virtues of their approach. [read post]
