Search for: "U. N. N." Results 6961 - 6980 of 7,276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
The Supreme Court’s Wetland Saga Continues July 13, 2023 | Monika U. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 6:52 am by Russell Knight
“[N]either the child, nor the obligee who is an individual, nor the obligor resides in the issuing state” 750 ILCS 22/611(a)(1)(A) If the parent seeking modification of the child support is a resident of Illinois…you cannot modify in Illinois. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am by Eric Goldman
In response to an email inquiry from a non-sponsor seeking clarification of the rules regarding whether it would be permissible for her to “discuss the Olympics…on social media,” the USOC informed her: [U]nless a company or organization’s primary business is disseminating news and information, the company’s social media platforms (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, SnapChat, Instagram, etc.) are commercial in nature, serving to promote the company or brand; to raise the… [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm by Matthew Bush
General Revenue Corp.Docket: 11-1175Issue(s): (1) Whether a prevailing defendant in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) case may be awarded costs for a lawsuit that was not “brought in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment,” when the FDCPA provides that “[o]n a finding by the court that an action under this section was brought in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment, the court may award to the defendant attorney’s fees reasonable in relation to… [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Indeed, “[i]n the absence of an inter- ference or rejection which would require the PTO to make a determination of priority, the PTO does not make such findings as a matter of course in prosecution. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 3:58 am by Peter Mahler
The Court’s Decision In her decision last week in Borriello v Loconte, 2014 NY Slip Op 50241(U) [Sup Ct Kings County, Feb. 24, 2014], Brooklyn Commercial Division Presiding Justice Carolyn E. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Last week saw a remarkable Daily Mail editorial attacking the Guardian. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
., 2011 NY Slip Op 33256(U) (Sup Ct Queens County Nov. 3, 2011).Adelstein involves a family-owned distributor of specialty foods called Finest Food. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
In today’s rapidly evolving corporate landscape, the composition of boards is not just a matter of compliance or social responsibility; it’s a strategic imperative that shapes the future of firms. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 9:00 am by Guest Blogger
 In 2011, Borys Wrzesnewskyj, the former Liberal Member of Parliament for Etobicoke Centre, lost his seat to Conservative candidate Ted Opitz by a mere 26 votes. [read post]
12 May 2008, 4:59 pm
            The Respondent did not except to the judge's findings that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by withdrawing recognition from the Union, by unilaterally introducing the U-Scan self-service registers, and by failing to bargain with the Union about the effects of its decision to close two stores. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm
[u]se confidential information of a former client to the disadvantage of the former client after the representation is concluded unless the former client consents after consultation or the confidential information has become generally known. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 9:03 pm
Introduction There are many different theories of constitutional interpretation, but the most controversial and also perhaps the most influential is "originalism"--actually a loosely-knit family of constitutional theories. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
Conway III of the Wachtell Lipton law firm – who briefed and argued the Morrison case for the defendant bank –described the "listing" argument as "Completely nuts, N-U-T-S. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 7:29 am by Joy Waltemath
Also, she argued, “[n]othing about a notwithstanding clause renders it impervious to this established rule of statutory interpretation. [read post]