Search for: "*u. S. v. Nation" Results 681 - 700 of 2,698
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2012, 6:19 am by Luke Hagedorn
Standing at this crossroads in our nations energy policy, the key question is which paths these states will choose to best secure their place as a key player in the United State’s energy future. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 6:41 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The National Health Service is England’s publicly funded national healthcare system. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:43 pm by Lyle Denniston
” The case is Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 10:46 am by Beth Graham
  Currently, the United States Supreme Court is considering the issue in the consolidated cases of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 10:46 am by Beth Graham
  Currently, the United States Supreme Court is considering the issue in the consolidated cases of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 10:37 am by zbrown
Donohue, director of Georgetown’s Center on National Security and the Law, to discuss this recent circuit court ruling on electronic device searches at the U.S. border, reaction to the ruling, the First and Fourth Amendments, and next steps. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 4:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
This court agrees with Starmark.Yes, there was reference to i4i:This court has long held that because “[u]nder 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 5:53 am by Mark Hartsoe
Additional Resources: U-turn on Chapman Highway kills motorcyclist, by Don Jacobs, Knoxville News Sentinel Related Blog Posts: Knoxville Court Refuses to Exclude Physician’s Expert Testimony in Premises Liability Case: Starnes v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting on Monday 30 January  2012 are the appeals of PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, scheduled for 1.5 days to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:57 am by Peter Margulies
” As the Court has said repeatedly, most recently in 2015’s King v. [read post]