Search for: "District of Columbia v. Little"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
”[14]) Third, the government action at issue must infringe the Charter right “as little as possible. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 5:56 am
Martoma, 2014 WL 164181 (U.S.District Court for the Southern District of New York 2014). [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 8:50 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
Although Selikoff has little or no experience as an epidemiologist, he provided the “expert witness” support for the death claim based upon the very crude data from his insulator cohort study. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
Further, the Court in Brooks Furniture based its reading on the Supreme Court's decision in Professional Real Estate Investors v Columbia Pictures Industries (1993), but Judge Rader considered that the Supreme Court's decision did not alter the traditional fee-shifting rule. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 10:41 pm
Dec. 26, 2013).Issues[1] Sidense first faults the district court for its reliance on our decision in MarcTec, LLC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia, has ruled in Klayman v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
The exciting decision from the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia, Judge Richard Leon presiding, just came out, and it's quite powerful. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:28 am
It seems reasonable to read the words "such jurisdiction" in the phrase as referring back to the jurisdiction in which the judge is sitting; i.e., in this case, the District of Columbia, since the provision mentions no other jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Indeed, Eugene V. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 2:30 pm
Zivotofsky v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:16 am
There has been vigorous debate on how best to enforce the borders of the District of Columbia. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
United States District Judge William C. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:14 pm
In contrast to federal law, state law prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation is a dynamic patchwork with 21 states and the District of Columbia prohibiting sexual orientation discrimination. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:05 am
”13 Viacom v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
(S.) v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:10 pm
Professor Lund, though a supporter of gun rights, was quite critical of the Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 4:30 am
The case is Kennedy v. [read post]
