Search for: "United States v. Generes"
Results 681 - 700
of 35,456
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2016, 7:27 am
United States [SCOTUSblog materials] that a prior crime can be used for imposing enhanced federal sentences in a new conviction under the Armed Career Criminal Act [materials] (ACCA), "but only if its elements are the same as, or narrower than, those of the generic offense. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 11:54 am
Armed with Article VI, one of the treaty parties, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, filed suit, asking the federal court to declare the United States in breach of its treaty obligations and to order the United States to engage in good-faith negotiations. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 2:53 am
United States, was filed after a defendant was indicted and convicted in a federal drug distribution case on three counts. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
Although the California Supreme Court had held that waivers of class arbitration are unenforceable in Discover Bank, the United States Supreme Court rejected, and invalidated, that holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
Although the California Supreme Court had held that waivers of class arbitration are unenforceable in Discover Bank, the United States Supreme Court rejected, and invalidated, that holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:01 am
Montana, now over a decade in the making, is truly historic—the first-ever constitutional climate lawsuit to reach trial in the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:12 am
In DUI case, majority concludes that machine-generated data concerning positive test in a blood sample was not a statement of the lab technicians and therefore was not a hearsay statement, since it was not made by a person but a machine analyzing the sample; no Confrontation Clause issues were raised, in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:12 am
§ 1447(d) generally provides that “an order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal,” the United States Supreme Court explained in Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 6:29 am
As reported in our previous blogpost, on 7 October 2022, the US White House published an Executive Order on enhancing safeguards for United States signals intelligence activities (EO). [read post]
[Orin Kerr] Byrd v. United States: The Supreme Court Takes a Broad View of Fourth Amendment Standing
15 May 2018, 4:12 am
United States, the Fourth Amendment case on whether an unauthorized driver has rights to challenge the search of a rental car. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 5:08 pm
United States On February 12, 2016, Mr. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 1:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:18 pm
In response, the European consortiums filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia challenging the TTAB decision. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 11:02 pm
United States squarely rejected this distinction. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 10:00 am
Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania: Does a proceeding before the United States Department of the Interior Board of Contract Appeals constitute a “suit” such as to trigger insurance coverage under a commercial general liability policy? [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 12:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 2:48 pm
In Turner, the United States Supreme Court rejected a Brady claim because both prongs of this test were not satisfied. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 4:42 am
Here is the consent decree in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 12:04 pm
In an October 4, 2017 letter to all United States attorneys and heads of federal agencies, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) will no longer interpret Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) to provide employment protections to transgender individuals. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 12:04 pm
In an October 4, 2017 letter to all United States attorneys and heads of federal agencies, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) will no longer interpret Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) to provide employment protections to transgender individuals. [read post]
