Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 112,789
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2023, 7:19 am
Responding officers initially recommended charges of first-degree assault, but since the threat to kill was made to a third party, the law does not support a charge for assault. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:45 am
[Editor’s Note: This article continues a Just Security series, Prosecuting the Crime of Aggression Against Ukraine. [read post]
5 May 2023, 5:42 am
., 2nd Div. 2002 This does not mean that a lawyer can just work against his or her current employer. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:00 am
District Court Judge Jeffrey White dismissed the case, finding the ordinance does not directly regulate who can speak or what they can say. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:38 pm
Constitution, Newby added, the North Carolina constitution does not provide any guidance for courts to evaluate claims of partisan gerrymandering. [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:10 pm
If it does not grant either motion, the lawsuit will continue toward trial. [read post]
4 May 2023, 2:31 pm
For example, in the Merck case, the exclusion stated: “[t]his policy does not insure” against: Loss or damage caused by hostile or warlike action in time of peace or war, including action in hindering, combating, or defending against an actual, impending, or expected attack: By any government or sovereign power (de jure or de facto) or by any authority maintaining or using military, naval, or air forces; Or by military, naval, or air forces; Or by an agent… [read post]
4 May 2023, 1:11 pm
Keep in mind that merely because your pistol, revolver, or other gun does not have ammunition in the chamber or in a clip, for example, if you also have bullets in the case when you check your gun, your firearm is considered loaded as a matter of law. [read post]
4 May 2023, 10:25 am
Does this argument work? [read post]
4 May 2023, 10:00 am
(This article does not address the other antitrust and state law claims also at issue in the 91-page opinion.)The legal battle involved “a multi-trillion dollar technology company” (Apple) versus “a multi-billion dollar video game company” (Epic). [read post]
4 May 2023, 8:55 am
The ICJ published a clarification asserting the report does not call for this. [read post]
4 May 2023, 8:47 am
However, it is important to note that this regulation language does not alleviate businesses of ensuring they are not unusually reliant on the subcontractor, and it only applies to general construction contracts. [read post]
4 May 2023, 8:36 am
The team at Pyzer Criminal Lawyers is experienced in defending sexual assault charges. [read post]
4 May 2023, 8:00 am
If you need help understanding Idaho’s strict liability law for product defects or defending against a product liability claim, we are here to help. [read post]
4 May 2023, 7:44 am
Liu is not a proper defendant because he did not import the goods.Let's pause for a moment. [read post]
4 May 2023, 7:38 am
Even though the trial court did not consider whether defendant had attempted suicide by his jump, this did not show a failure to consider defendant’s capacity, as “[s]uicidality does not automatically render one incompetent,” and defendant could be suicidal without being incompetent, or vice versa. [read post]
4 May 2023, 6:42 am
While the notion that antitrust markets never relate to products that are licensed or sold can—and does—lead to the rejection of Epic’s proposed relevant market (if Apple does not license or sell its iOS, by the district court’s own reasoning, iOS can’t be the relevant market), the crucial point is that Epic had failed to show that consumers were unaware that purchasing iOS devices “locks” them in, as precedent requires. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:30 am
Among them, the plaintiff claimed that her supervisor told her that she “does not want an old Jewish woman running a multicultural department. [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:58 am
The Smart Study court did conclude the Hague Convention does not apply where a defendant’s address is unknown. [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:36 am
While it'd be hard to believe that a business would shut down to avoid one employee's discrimination claim, this business does have a certain track record. [read post]
