Search for: "People v Levelle" Results 6981 - 7000 of 12,300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Google doesn't want you to limit its ability to follow you around the internet http://t.co/9vYzPQjxcK -> RT @eurorights: 'French blogger owes $2,000 in damages for review 'too prominent' on Google'. http://t.co/UHMDvye7hC -> RT @thenetmonitor: Putin signs law that could end up blocking Facebook and Twitter in Russia http://t.co/gXCDBlKZps -> RT @PrivacyDigest: 26 Questions EU Regulators Want Google to Answer – Digits – WSJ http://t.co/wx2qjD1yBp ->… [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 2:06 pm by Dave
 It is an interesting form of localism that requires local schemes to have a minimum level of consistency. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 4:50 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The defense is also mistaken in its reliance on People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am by Ben
 Pirate Bay co-founder Peter Sunde, has filed a another complaint about his current incarceration in the mid-level security facility Västervik Norra, saying the prison authority has failed to arrange a meeting between him and a representative of the Church Of Kopimism, which as Eleonora reported some time ago is, in Sweden, recognised as a religious group. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 2:24 pm
And because of that, and because of the unique nature of a university campus setting, I think that there are very good and compelling reasons why broader policies and prohibitions on conduct in activities and in some instances speech are acceptable on a college campus level that might not be acceptable say in an adult work environment or in an adult situation. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:09 am by Shari Shapiro
 Or maybe it is because when you go to a cocktail party and start to talk about building energy codes, people feel compelled to refill their plate of cheez-its. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:09 am by Shari Shapiro
 Or maybe it is because when you go to a cocktail party and start to talk about building energy codes, people feel compelled to refill their plate of cheez-its. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:30 am by David DePaolo
The plaintiffs have told WorkCompCentral that even if they win at the summary judgment level it is still just "round one of a 10-round fight. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 8:00 pm by Hannah Roskey
In this case, the appeal court upheld the just-cause termination of a senior manager responsible for safety when his employer discovered—after having terminated his employment without cause—that he had used his company cell phone to solicit illegal drugs from several people, including a direct subordinate (Van den Boogaard v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
" In papers, plaintiff theorizes that the previous cases mentioned are examples of an "extraordinarily speech-protective law" emerging from the Supreme Court's decision in New York Times Co. v Sullivan. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:30 pm
 Will a lot of people seek to sneak survey evidence is, even where it shouldn't be? [read post]