Search for: "State v. C. R." Results 7001 - 7020 of 13,583
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2016, 1:33 pm
 BREAKING: CJEU says that EU law allows e-lendingEleonora Rosati comments on the press release in the Case C-174/15 Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v Stichting Leenrecht, in which the concept of lending under the Rental and Lending Rights Directive (2006/115/EC) includes the lending of e-books under the ‘one copy, one user’ model.Around the Web BlogsInternKat Hayleigh recaps the highlights of some IP blogs! [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 1:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
An interesting decision from the Arizona Court of Appeals last Thursday, in State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 6:57 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
On 19 December 2013, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered its ruling in Corman-Collins SA v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The facts in Shapiro v Ettenson, 2015 NY Slip Op 31670(U) [Sup Ct NY County Aug. 16, 2015], are fairly simple. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
Editor's Note: This post contains the text of a speech that former Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson delivered on Feb. 6 at the American Constitution Society (ACS) Symposium at the Georgetown University Law Center. *** I am happy to be part of this symposium. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 6:06 am
  As McFarlane J.A. stated in  Lutes, s. 2(c) "does not provide for the awarding of damages as between persons who are at fault. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:31 pm
KQED, Inc., 438 U.S. 1, 11 (1978) (stating that “[t]here is an undoubted right to gather news ‘from any source by means within the law’” (quoting Branzburg v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
School of Law) Christopher Jon Sprigman (NYU School of Law) Geoffrey R. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
Senators have now joined the Frank R. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
It is hard to see how.At least since the Supreme Court’s landmark 1943 ruling in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Russell Spivak
As for the final piece of the contextual puzzle, the CCR’s motion points out “President Trump’s [r]efusal to [r]elease [p]etitioners [d]uring [h]is [p]residency. [read post]