Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES" Results 7021 - 7040 of 44,319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2012, 7:41 am by Sara Hutchins Jodka
Despite the inherent conflict between the two jurisdictions, the United States Supreme Court has declined to take up the issue and settle the split. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 1:32 pm by msW1Ld
  On September 8, 2011, the United States District for the District of Colorado rejected such tactics. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 6:24 pm
As noted in this prior post, a Sixth Circuit panel earlier this month indicated that all three members would "strongly recommend" en banc review of the "important question" of "whether the continuing use of acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement violates United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 7:47 am
He emphasized, however, that the non-refoulement provision applies only to persons actually in the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:30 am by Amy Howe
(argued April 16, 2018): U.S. laws generally apply only to conduct that happens in the United States. [read post]
Case date: 17 March 2021 Case number: No. 19-2316 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 6:44 am
This week, the United States Supreme Court decided whether a state can require a voter to present a photo ID before casting a ballot (Crawford v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 9:06 pm by Gabriel Scheffler
For instance, in tweeting out an announcement of its proposed replacement for the Clean Power Plan vacated in West Virginia v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Appellate Courts differ regarding the State’s reduction of its employer contribution towards health insurance premiums for certain State retireesBransten v State of New York, 117 AD3d 455 Retired Pub. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
” Determining in which counties around the United States sales of the creams occurred in this case would be impossible. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:02 am
Freezing the payment of salary increments does not freeze the crediting of service for the purpose of determining an employee's increment stepMatter of Meegan v Brown, 63 AD3d 1673In response to a State Comptroller's report concerning a fiscal crisis in the City of Buffalo, the State Legislature passed the Buffalo Fiscal Stability Authority Act on July 3, 2003. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:17 pm
Freezing the payment of salary increments does not freeze the crediting of service for the purpose of determining an employee's increment stepMatter of Meegan v Brown, 63 AD3d 1673In response to a State Comptroller's report concerning a fiscal crisis in the City of Buffalo, the State Legislature passed the Buffalo Fiscal Stability Authority Act on July 3, 2003. [read post]