Search for: "IN RE GUESS"
Results 7021 - 7040
of 16,480
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2013, 12:23 pm
Sometimes, I guess, even the serious stumble. [read post]
8 May 2013, 9:48 am
Based on the numbers we've seen in other cases, my guess is that the total value of "diverted" clicks--if any exist at all--is more properly measured by pennies, not millions. ____ Pending roster of AdWords trademark lawsuits against Google: * Parts.com v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:59 pm
In other words, appellate courts freely second-guess decisions of law, but are less likely to second-guess findings of fact. [read post]
6 May 2013, 8:56 am
And I guess this is the one that matters the most. [read post]
3 May 2013, 11:31 am
I guess there are lots of reasons. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:58 am
In its response to Apple's effort to win a permanent injunction in the United States against many Samsung products over multiple intellectual property rights, Samsung argues that the sales ban sought by Apple -- and denied by Judge Koh in December despite a multiplicity of infringement findings by a California jury in August 2012 -- "would not stop any ongoing infringement, for Samsung has either discontinued the accused products or designed around any infringing features in the ones it still… [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:23 am
Minn. 2007) In re Rezulin Prods. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 2:53 pm
Firms have cut and re-jiggered staff but from what I see, they have not fundamentally analyzed or re-thought support. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 1:46 pm
I guess that's because she's very committed to accuracy and she recognized her error with respect to the Galaxy S II AT&T; she declined to find an error with respect to the Infuse 4G. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Disruption is in the eye of the beholder, I guess. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 7:06 am
They’re going to be fighting for it. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 10:10 am
But given the inherently case-by-case nature of fair use determinations, at the very least the court has provided one more data point against which artists may compare their own work to decide whether they’re in the clear. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 7:30 am
As Wells noted on Tuesday, the D.C. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 6:37 am
I'm guessing "lower-tier." [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 11:50 am
(If you complain, you’re just pontificating.)In fairness to Hyman, a lot of law professors did confidently make predictions about the case, predictions very different from mine. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 1:52 pm
Work to obtain or re-instate Housing Benefit is out of scope, see paragraph 15 of Part 2, Schedule 1 of LASPO. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 1:52 pm
Work to obtain or re-instate Housing Benefit is out of scope, see paragraph 15 of Part 2, Schedule 1 of LASPO. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 11:30 am
Then again, I guess the plaintiffs should look on the bright side that they were just disciplined, and not charged with something more serious, like a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act or for violation of an e-personation statute. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 10:42 am
The last thing you want is for your family to have to guess at your intentions. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:06 am
I guess I can only hope and wait for Wisconsin to join other states and recognize the validity of one of these contracts. [read post]
