Search for: "Daniel v. Daniel" Results 7041 - 7060 of 7,813
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by fjhinojosa
Beyer’s article Estate Planning Ramifications of Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:26 am
Last week the court ruled on the issue in The Hebrew University of Jerusalem v General Motors LLC. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Note the approach of the TGI is particularly fascinating when compared, this time, with the recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) of 7 February 2017 in the case Rolf Anders Daniel PIHL v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:45 am
In a Nov. 1 letter, the senators called on the SEC not to take action on either draft rule and instead allow shareholders to continue filing proxy access resolutions based on the 2006 AFSCME v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 6:12 am
(Delaware Supreme Court and Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, September 12, 2018 Tags: Campaign finance, Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:44 am by Jon Hyman
– from Daniel Schwartz’s Connecticut Employment Law Blog Religion at Work – from Suzanne Lucas, the Evil HR Lady Hospital Sued Over English-Only Rule – from Joe’s HR and Benefits Blog Dollar Value of Employment Cases – from Tom Crane’s San Antonio Employment Law Blog Steak and sex: Fleming’s settles male-on-male harassment claim – from Sindy Warren at the Warren & Hays Employment Law Blog … [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
., on Wednesday, August 31, 2022 Tags: Climate change, Comment letters, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors, Materiality, SEC, Securities regulation, Sustainability Corporate Political Spending and State Tax Policy: Evidence from Citizens United Posted by Cailin Slattery (University of California Berkeley), Alisa Tazhitdinova (University of California Santa Barbara), and Sarah Robinson (University of California Santa Barbara),… [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 7:16 am by Jackie McDermott
The Assange indictment may seem reminiscent of the Pentagon Papers case, New York Times Co v. [read post]