Search for: "People v. Downs" Results 7041 - 7060 of 16,918
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2023, 7:43 am by Eugene Volokh
The decision the majority hands down today is, in my view, simply wrong. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 2:28 pm
The German court asked the Court of Justice whether the principle of free movement of goods laid down in Article 28 EC precludes the German law prohibiting the sale by mail order of DVDs and videos that are not labelled as having been vetted by the German authorities as to their suitability for young people. [read post]
2 Jun 2025, 1:20 pm by Giles Peaker
Following Stewart v Watts and Global 100 v Laleva, it was clear that Street v Mountford was to be under [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:14 pm by Jason Shinn
A prime example of this struggle is the recent en banc decision of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in EEOC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
The state cannot allow non-religious people to follow their consciences but strictly enforce the law against religious people. [read post]
5 May 2019, 11:10 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Against the odds, and the wishes of police unions, HB 2754 (White) limiting arrests for fine-only Class-C misdemeanor violations is scheduled for a floor vote in the Texas House tomorrow (though it's about 100 bills down on the calendar, and so could be pushed til Tuesday).The legislation has its roots in the US Supreme Court case, Atwater v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 10:42 am by Joseph Greenlee
Heller, which struck down prohibitions on handguns and functional firearms in the home. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 8:58 am by Elijah Yip
I have to believe in my heart that somewhere down the road, bad people end up facing bad circumstances! [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 5:43 am by Bob Farb
The officer then searched the defendant, pulling down or removing both his pants and underwear. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm by Giles Peaker
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council v Mailley (2022) EWHC 2328 (QB) A quick note on this possession claim, which involves a challenge to Section 87 Housing Act 1985 as incompatible with Article 8 and 14 ECHR. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
The Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 4:34 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The new petition and appendix were filed in Pedersen v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 10:50 pm by Steve Baird
So, where do you come down on this issue? [read post]