Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 7041 - 7060
of 55,734
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm
For my presentation, I focused on 1973’s National Petroleum Refiners Association v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm
Remarkably, the agency’s claimed ambit of prosecutorial discretion to identify “unfair” practices is apparently only limited by a commitment to exercise such power “responsibly. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:08 pm
Bartenwerfer v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 12:59 pm
” Pfaff v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 11:30 am
[17] Meinhard v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 10:51 am
Walker v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:48 am
Williams v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:42 am
The hiQ v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:09 am
A Ninth Circuit ruling last week in a case involving bear baiting, Safari Club v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 6:47 am
Another case, Cooper Tire & Rubber Company v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 5:01 am
From Graber v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:30 am
" He has made it clear that, in addition to rejecting Roe and Casey, and the delegation doctrine, a particular object of his scorn is Obergefell v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 11:47 pm
The effect of the only leading case in that area – Harries v Church Commissioners for England [1992] 1 WLR 1241, aka the Bishop of Oxford case, which concerned the Church of England’s investment policy in relation to South Africa – was unclear [1]: there is a helpful note on Harries here. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
The same blog has also published an article on the recent decisions in The Queen on the application of Privacy International v Investigatory Powers Tribunal [2022] EWHC 770 QB and Her Majesty’s Attorney General for England and Wales v British Broadcasting Corporation [2022] EWHC 826 (QB), on the topic of closed judgments. [read post]
1 May 2022, 2:54 pm
But unlike consumers, voters never have unilateral decision-making power. [read post]
1 May 2022, 8:54 am
Section 230 provided vital cover to those inside organizations who wished to advocate for harm reduction solutions and serve marginalized populations, and thus the impact of liability removal will vary more based on the political power of groups impacted than the letter of the law. 4. [read post]
1 May 2022, 6:57 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 6:30 am
Wade and Kelo v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 6:15 am
That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. [read post]
1 May 2022, 1:45 am
The first is consistency: law promises that we shall be treated with equity, not according to someone’s arbitrary feelings or according to our own individual status and power. [read post]
