Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 7041 - 7060
of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2023, 2:24 pm
United States 23-219Issue: Whether, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 7:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 5:32 am
See, United States v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 10:20 am
The challengers are a group of U.S. citizens whose smartphones and laptops were searched at the border while they were re-entering the United States from traveling abroad. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 12:01 pm
Secret law runs rampant in the United States, particularly when national security is concerned. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:43 pm
This reduces the burden on witnesses. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:35 am
United States of America is particularly difficult. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:48 am
Unlike the United States and its agencies, federal contractors do not enjoy absolute immunity. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 4:10 pm
According to EFF's Atlas of Surveillance, at least 100 cities in the United States use some kind of acoustic gunshot detection, including ShotSpotter. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:22 am
§ 706(2)(E).Section 102(b) provides that a person shall be entitledto a patent unless the invention was described in a printedpublication more than one year prior to the date ofapplication for patent in the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:41 pm
As of December 2013, Schutte Inc. hadn’t designed, manufactured, or offered any products for sale in the United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm
Each passing year brings more appellate court decisions, at the state and federal levels, addressing arbitration. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm
Each passing year brings more appellate court decisions, at the state and federal levels, addressing arbitration. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 3:37 pm
ANTOINE SMITH, Appellant, v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am
The government need only demonstrate that the surveillance targets “persons reasonably believed to be located outside the United States” and seeks “foreign intelligence information. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 10:33 am
The assistant prosecutor sued, claiming that the ECPO violated the United States Constitution’s Free Exercise Clause and the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
In Barr v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm
The right these plaintiffs seek is not a new right, but a right that these individuals have always been guaranteed by the United States Constitution. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am
” http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/839921.opn.pdf State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 11:16 am
United States and Obergefell v. [read post]
