Search for: "STATE v FIELD" Results 7061 - 7080 of 12,942
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2014, 3:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
To conclude that officers in the field must follow a plan which is set in place by the higher echelons, and then to conclude that the officers in the field may cavalierly disregard certain key elements of that plan, whether intentionally or unintentionally, would be to countenance the "standardless and unconstrained discretion" and "evil" the Supreme Court spoke about in the case of Delaware v Prouse,, 440 US 648, 661 [1979]. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Each of these provisions have slightly different conditions attached and each have made their way into the national law of 28 member states in slightly different ways. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 2:43 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 34 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: R v Ahmad & Anor; Fields & Ors v CPS [2014] UKSC 36 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:58 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 March 2014. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:00 pm
On June 13, 2014, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals issued its opinion in Alabama Forrest Products Industry Workmen’s Compensation Self Insurer’s Fund v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 3:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the case of People v Scott, 63 NY2d 518 [1984], the criminal court held that a roadblock or checkpoint stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 1:52 am
Managing Intellectual Property magazine is compiling its annual list of the 50 most influential people in the field of intellectual property this year. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 1:56 pm by Stephen Bilkis
For allegedly displaying certain outward indicia of intoxication and failing four out of five field sobriety tests, defendant was asked to give a breath sample. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:04 am by INFORRM
As the decision states, and it is consistent with all the judicial approaches in the past, “in the field of national security, a Court will not lightly depart from the assessment made by a Minister. [read post]