Search for: "In Re: Michael"
Results 7141 - 7160
of 14,817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2018, 3:19 pm
Even when reform advocates lose - as happened in the Dallas Democratic primary - their participation shifts the conversation more squarely on reform topics that otherwise get little attention.Considering abolitionismGrits has never completely rejected the positions of prison abolitionists so much as I have avoided them - to me, we're a long way from when that conversation is ripe, certainly here in Texas. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:15 am
Video might not resolve every dispute, it might not guarantee indictments or discipline in every case where they’re deserved — but the chances of justice without it seem much less. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
Michael F. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:30 am
Author Michael B. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 3:49 am
In re Michael D. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:29 am
Editor Michael B. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 9:55 am
By Michael M. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 1:45 pm
Now, we’re fighting to stop the government’s unconstitutional attempt to create a new rights-free zone. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 9:40 am
In the case titled In re Robbins, one notes the following: JAMES R. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 4:11 am
Jamal Jalen Carter, Opposition No. 91255846 (March 21, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:48 am
Michael K. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:38 am
To explain how we got to this point, Linda Greenhouse and Michael Graetz argued in The Burger Court and the Rise of the Judicial Right that any progress that the Warren Court had made was undone by the subsequent Burger Court’s counter-revolution. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 12:53 pm
Those directors need assurances not only that the company will cover their expenses if they win but also that the company will pay fees as they're incurred. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:25 am
Click here for further details and, if you're interested, you'd better get a move on since the closing date for applications is 22 May 2015.Around the weblogs. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
" However, observed the court, a page in which a nonparty FOIL requester, Michael Thomas, discussed certain sensitive matters was not covered by the personal privacy exemption to FOIL because Thomas "consent[ed] in writing to disclosure" by waiving, in an affidavit, any right to confidentiality in any of the records sought. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 6:30 am
Editor Michael B. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IPRoo) Prior use grace period - an anomaly for divisional patent applications (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) 'Down Under' by Men At Work - derivative copyright dispute to go to Court (The IP Factor) Two Men and a Truck beat Three Men & a Truck in trade mark dispute before the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Bosnia and Herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina deposits instrument of accession to the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement… [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 2:32 pm
This advice is on my mind of late what with two former Trump folks — George Popadopouluos and Michael Flynn — pleading guilty to the federal crime of lying to the FBI. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
For readers seeking a thorough overview of this topic, I recommend Michael Conklin’s recent article arguing that American judges should refrain from making pop culture references in their decisions. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm
Michael Weinberg Shapeways: High level concept works reasonably well given the circumstances. [read post]
