Search for: "People v. Long"
Results 7161 - 7180
of 19,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2019, 5:40 am
That case is Sterns v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:51 am
However, where disqualification is not required under objective standards, a judge ‘is the sole arbiter of recusal’ (People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405 [1987]). [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 7:00 am
That’s what the Supreme Court did in Welsh v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:00 am
That’s something courts have been concerned about for quite some time – for instance, here’s a quote from the 1st Circuit’s 1992 decision in Milton v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 8:45 am
In fact, in the case Bungie, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Supreme Court, and both sides have vowed to take Perry v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:36 pm
No one can argue that the judicial system should lack integrity or that it could long endure if most people doubt its impartiality. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:14 am
The Case of Our Savior Lutheran Church v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:10 pm
GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC that the Rosen-Durling test is out and the tried and true Graham v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:53 am
Additional Resources: Coskery v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:53 am
Additional Resources: Coskery v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 2:18 pm
The issue of “vindictive sentencing” was addressed in the recent case of Carballo v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
"In Collins v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:16 am
2013 was not a happy new year very long. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 4:21 pm
Rich v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
It does honor to the distinguished and long running series of which it is now an integral part. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In Mills, the plaintiff claimed that, due to a variant gene (“CYP”), she could not metabolize the defendant’s drug as well as most other people. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
Some might argue that that is not really a conviction, to which there is a short answer and a long answer to this criticism. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 4:30 am
The vast majority of them take their ethical responsibilities seriously, especially when it comes to accepting gifts from people with interests before them and deciding whom they may socialize with if they fear people may be seeking to influence them. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 1:28 am
E: Which would be absurd.SL: Most people would think so. [read post]
