Search for: "Application of Barrett" Results 701 - 720 of 1,025
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2016, 9:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Therefore, the single publication rule is applicable and the complaint was properly dismissed as untimely under the one-year statute of limitations…. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
As the dissent pointed out in language applicable to most of the Roberts Court's separation of powers cases:The text of the Constitution allows these common for-cause removal limits. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
The plaintiffs (technically "applicants" in SCOTUS) sought a stay of the rule. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:18 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Though it is less well known, and before it became politically necessary for now-jurists John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett to dutifully carry out their part of the 2000 Republican strategy that resulted the 5-4 Bush v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am by Michael C. Dorf
With the possible exception of Justice Barrett, the conservatives were skeptical of what they call a broad reading of a criminal law and apparently want to narrow it by deploying a canon that sounds in purposivism, while the liberals seemed to take the opposite view. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Also analysing the application of AI the LSE Media Policy Project Blog has considered its use in media to drive “intelligent news”. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm by Whitney Hodges
The unanimous opinion, authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, found “[n]othing in constitutional text, history or precedent supports exempting legislatures from ordinary takings rules. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Writing for herself and three colleagues, Justice Amy Coney Barrett said that the Arizona Supreme Court’s distinction did not contradict prior Arizona law because no previous case had presented the question “whether a ‘significant change’ occurs when an intervening decision reaffirms existing law, but rectifies an erroneous application of that law. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Gorsuch J for the Court (Roberts CJ, and Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh and Barrett JJ concurring) held that the First Amendment prohibits Colorado from forcing the appellant, a designer who intended to produce customized and tailored wedding websites, to create expressive designs conveying messages with which she disagrees, such as for for same-sex marriage. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 6:05 am by Jeff Welty
Justice Barrett dissented in an opinion joined by Justices Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 9:07 am by Eugene Volokh
Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, and Barrett dissented, as did Justice Alito with regard to the content discrimination question. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:30 am by Minyao Wang
Alito’s majority opinion All members of the court agreed that under step one of the test, the Lanham Act has no extraterritorial application. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 11:05 am by Brian Bernhardt
  Instead, the 2004 language “bears scant resemblance” to the per-account language applicable to willful penalties. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:51 am by Minyao Wang
Justice Amy Coney Barrett then jumped in to clarify that the court itself had never embraced this method as a tool of statutory construction. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Adam Chan
The Court presented PennEast as a watershed, breaking with the previous narrow application of structural waiver to bankruptcy powers only in Katz and establishing a definitive test for when structural waiver is applicable. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 7:14 pm by David A. Barrett, Esq.
However, Facebook can be rather limited for lawyer marketing in its historical perception as the domain of “college kids,” the focus of most Facebook applications on fun rather than professional uses, and the privacy issues involved with taking on unknown “friends” into your online world of family photos, romantic relationships and college drinking buddies. [read post]