Search for: "BARR V. STATE"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,075
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2021, 3:02 am
Barr v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm
Data Protection Report has a comment on the decision of the US Supreme Court in Barr v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 5:50 pm
Barr. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
See Dulong v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
., v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Balancing competing rights Irish defamation cases are increasingly replete with comments stating the need to balance the constitutional right to freedom of expression with the constitutional right to a good name. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Afro-Indian anti-counterfeit legislation debate; Legislation prompts India to send delegation to Africa (Spicy IP) (Afro-IP) (Afro-IP) Drug seizures in Frankfurt spark fears of EU-wide pattern (Intellectual Property Watch) General Broad plan on IP, innovation in developing countries approved at WHO (Intellectual Property Watch) World… [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Afro-Indian anti-counterfeit legislation debate; Legislation prompts India to send delegation to Africa (Spicy IP) (Afro-IP) (Afro-IP) Drug seizures in Frankfurt spark fears of EU-wide pattern (Intellectual Property Watch) General Broad plan on IP, innovation in developing countries approved at WHO (Intellectual Property Watch) World… [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:41 am
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 7:28 am
Wilkes-Barre Hospital Co., LLC, July 6, 2016, Mannion, M.). [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:22 pm
This prescriber testimony was uncontroverted, so the defendant won, despite the state-law presumption.Odom v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
Sanford, Plessy v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 2:11 pm
” On the second point, the authorization for committee staff to question witnesses is an exercise of Rule XI, clause 2(j)(2)(C) of the House rules, which states that committees may so authorize staff. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm
Two seminal events have occurred in recent days in the ongoing oversight war between the House of Representatives and the Trump administration—and in the ongoing expansion of the doctrine of executive privilege. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 6:55 pm
Barr, et al. [read post]
19 May 2020, 1:52 pm
Returning Relists Andrus v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am
There is no stated necessity that the need or the risk be significant or substantial. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:27 am
United States v. [read post]
