Search for: "D. Sharp v. State"
Results 701 - 720
of 752
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm
, 145 F.Supp. 3d 573 (D.S.C. 2015), reconsideration den’d, 2016 WL 827067 (D.S.C. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm
Nov. 20, 2015) [Lipitor Jewell], reconsideration den’d, 2016 WL 827067 (D.S.C. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and… [read post]
Statement by Zeid Ra'ad al Hussein on the Opening of the 32nd Session of the UN Human Rights Council
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
The horror comes not merely from the subject of the listing but from its banality, the reduction of its components to ritualized actions whose principle interest in in its aggregation ("In Italia seicento e quaranta; In Alemagna duecento e trentuna; Cento in Francia, in Turchia novantuna; Ma in Ispagna son già mille e tre"), without regard to rank, value or societal impact ("E v'han donne d'ogni grado, D'ogni forma, d'ogni… [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
” Goldsmith agreed* with Wittes’s assessment and noted that, despite the “sharp rhetoric of the policy objections,” the Obama Administration had not “expended any real political capital in support of i [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
Evan Brown posted a snippet of the Daily Show's wonderful explanation of the Viacom v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm
In Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) Tugendhat J referred to the judgment of the House of Lords in Sim v Stretch ([1936] 2 All ER 1237) and to the judgment of Sharp J in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd ([2009] EWHC 2779 (QB)) and held that, “whatever definition of ‘defamatory’ is adopted, it must include a qualification or threshold of seriousness, so as to exclude trivial claims” [89]. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am
Long post, lots of stuff to cover in this opinion.MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:09 am
They are designed to move the FTC back toward the largely bipartisan approach that characterized decision making for more than 30 years, spawning the Janet D. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
The Counterargument of Judges Brown and Kavanaugh In a 2010 case, al-Bihani v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Garcia-Udall v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
The obstruction charge does include a statement that the charged actions were “consistent with President Trump’s previous efforts to undermine United States Government investigations into foreign interference in United States elections. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
See for example, R. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
Some state laws on this may also have to be addressed.Why are 11 of 26 biosimilars approved not actively marketed in the US? [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Dinwoodie: state of law or practice? [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
” Take, for example, his statement that Burwell v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Although only briefly in private practice, Weinstein did serve as a member of the legendary team of attorneys who worked on the appeal to the Supreme Court of Brown v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 4:28 am
In PLAL's brave new world, they'd all be suitable for aggregated (that is class certification) treatment. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 12:21 pm
That happened in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
