Search for: "FIRST ENERGY CORP." Results 701 - 720 of 1,699
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
China National Chartering Company Ltd v Gard Marine and Energy Ltd & Anor, Gard Marine and Entergy Ltd  v China National Chartering Company Ltd & Anor, and Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha v Gard Marine and Energy Ltd & Anor, heard 1-3 November 2016. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
Ed. 2d 97 (2015) (joined opinion) Tax Injunction Act “deprived the district court of jurisdiction to enjoin Colorado’s tax collection effort, we remand to the district court to dismiss DMA’s Commerce Clause claims” Energy & Env’t Legal Inst. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am by RJ Marse
”[7] Defendants and several intervening Energy Industry Groups filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Pantron I Corp., 33 F.3d 1088, 1097 (9th Cir. 1994) (even if some consumers were satisfied and became repeat purchasers, claims were false as a matter of law). [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 6:51 am by Teresa Walrod
Meanwhile, the Army Corps of Engineers is being ordered to “review and approve in an expedited manner” the North Dakota pipeline plan of Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 7:12 am by John McFarland
Last week the Texas Supreme Court granted petitions to hear appeals of two cases that could significantly affect the rights of Texas land and mineral owners: Atmos Energy Corp v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, et al., No. 16-712 1. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 1:18 pm by Jane Chong
Section V: Retention An IC element may retain raw SIGINT for up to five years “after the information is first collected by NSA,” unless continued retention (for up to another five years) is approved in writing by the IC head. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 4:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 First and foremost, the rise in collective investor actions reflects extensive legislative changes a number of countries have introduced in recent years to permit actions for collective redress. [read post]
  The Rule became effective on August 28, 2015; however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit stayed the Rule nationwide in October of 2015 in Murray Energy Corp. v. [read post]
  The Rule became effective on August 28, 2015; however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit stayed the Rule nationwide in October of 2015 in Murray Energy Corp. v. [read post]